E-Readers and Reading Comprehension – Education & Teacher Conferences Skip to main content

E-Readers and Reading Comprehension

AdobeStock_114246563_Credit

The invaluable Daniel Willingham briefly reviews the literature, and concludes that — for the time being — students understand more when they read on paper than when they use e-readers.

Willingham acknowledges that his review isn’t comprehensive. However, he’s recently written a book about reading instruction, and so I suspect he’s more up-to-date than most in this field.

If he’s right, this conclusion should give pause to the many (MANY) schools that are switching to e-textbooks. I know they have advantages; they’re less expensive, more portable, easier to modify to suit a specific teacher’s or student’s needs.

And yet, if students learn less when reading them, none of those advantages matters!

Willingham is hopeful that the quality of e-readers will improve enough to eliminate this discrepancy. Until that happens, and until we have good research showing that students can learn well from e-readers, old-fashioned books seem like the best technology we have.

(Scott MacClintic, this blog’s tech guru, will have some thoughts on this topic soon…)


Recent Blogs

Do Gestures Improve Learning? Baby Steps Toward a Conclusion [Reposted]
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

This post first appeared in October of 2025.    The...

The Neuroscience Trap: When Skeptics Stop Being Skeptical
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

I collaborated on this post with Dr. Cindy Nebel. Her...

I Take It All Back: Research on “Expressive Writing” Has Evolved
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

I spend my days giving research-informed advice to teachers and...