Skip to main content

Criticizing Critical Thinking

AdobeStock_29005489_Credit

Over at Newsweek, Alexander Nazaryan wants to vex you. Here’s a sample:

Only someone who has uncritically mastered the intricacies of Shakespeare’s verse, the social subtexts of Elizabethan society and the historical background of Hamlet is going to have any original or even interesting thoughts about the play. Everything else is just uninformed opinion lacking intellectual valence.

If you’d like a more nuanced version of this argument, check out Daniel Willingham’s Why Don’t Students Like School. 

In particular, you might read…

Chapter 2: “Factual knowledge must precede skill”

Chapter 4:  “We understand things in the context of what we already know, and most of what we know is concrete”

Chapter 5: “It is virtually impossible to become proficient at a mental task without extended practice”

and chapter 6: “Cognition early in training is different from cognition late in training”

From another vantage point: my own book Learning Begins discusses the dangers of working memory overload lurking in efforts to teach critical thinking.

Whether you prefer Nazaryan’s emphatic declamations, or Willingham’s and my more research-focused commentary, take some time to think critically about all the cognitive legwork that must precede real critical thought.


Recent Blogs

As We Begin: Dispositions of Mind, Learning, and the Brain in Early Childhood by Tia Henteleff
Erik Jahner, PhD
Erik Jahner, PhD

There’s a line quoted in Tia Henteleff’s As We Begin...

Too Good to be True? The Effect of Tetris on PTSD Symptoms
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

Teachers and school leaders turn to research -- in part...

Will Chess Make Me Better at Baseball?
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

Imagine for a moment that I'm coaching college baseball. I've...