To Ban or Not to Ban: A Usefully Provocative Answer – Education & Teacher Conferences Skip to main content

To Ban or Not to Ban: A Usefully Provocative Answer

AdobeStock_49196205_Credit

For every enthusiastic voice championing the use of laptops in classrooms, we hear equally skeptical claims. College professors, in particular, have been increasingly vocal about banning distractions to ensure that students stay focused.

James M. Lang–a professor of English, who also also directs the Center for Teaching Excellence at Assumption College–pushes back against such bans.

In a striking comparison, he views problems with distracted laptop users the same way he views problems with cheating.

If lots of students are cheating on a particular assignment, Lang argues, then it’s time for us to change that assignment.

So too with laptop distractions. If lots of students are browsing FB posts, their disorientation lets us know that this current teaching method just isn’t working.

Lang’s argument implies that even if we take away the laptop, our teaching method hasn’t gotten any better.

Provocatively, this argument shifts an important responsibility from students to teachers; Lang, after all, tells us that students’ attention is as much our job as theirs.

Wisely, Lang offers specific classroom approaches to ensure that students use their laptops for good, not for ill.


Recent Blogs

When Retrieval Practice Backfires (and When It Doesn’t)
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

If you've heard about retrieval practice, you've probably heard this...

Beyond the Science of Reading by Natalie Wexler
Erik Jahner, PhD
Erik Jahner, PhD

There is something almost combustible about stepping into the reading...

Why Cognitive Science in Education Feels Fragmented—and How Self-Efficacy Helps
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

I've got good news: cognitive psychology has SO MANY practical...