Let’s Have More Fun with the Correlation/Causation Muddle – Education & Teacher Conferences Skip to main content

Let’s Have More Fun with the Correlation/Causation Muddle

We’ve explored the relationship of correlation and causation before on the blog.

In particular, this commentary on DeBoer’s blog notes that — while correlation doesn’t prove causation — it might be a useful first step in discovering causation.

DeBoer argues for a difficult middle ground. He wants us to know (say it with me) that “correlation doesn’t prove causation.” AND he wants us to be reasonably skeptical, not thoughtlessly reactive.

On some occasions, we really ought to pay attention to correlation.

More Fun

I recently stumbled across a livelier way to explore this debate: a website called Spurious Correlations.

If you’d like to explore the correlation between — say — the number of letters in the winning word of the Scripps National Spelling Bee and — hmmm — the number of people killed by venomous spiders: this is definitely website for you.

Just so you know, the correlation of the divorce rate in Maine with per-capita consumption of margarine is higher than 99%.


Recent Blogs

The Neuroscience Trap: When Skeptics Stop Being Skeptical
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

I collaborated on this post with Dr. Cindy Nebel. Her...

I Take It All Back: Research on “Expressive Writing” Has Evolved
Andrew Watson
Andrew Watson

I spend my days giving research-informed advice to teachers and...

The Creativity Choice: The Science of Making Decisions to Turn Ideas into Action by Zorana Ivcevic Pringle
Erik Jahner, PhD
Erik Jahner, PhD

It happened just this morning! I was watching my favorite...