{"id":7244,"date":"2023-09-12T08:00:33","date_gmt":"2023-09-12T13:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/blog\/?p=7244"},"modified":"2023-09-12T16:20:04","modified_gmt":"2023-09-12T21:20:04","slug":"getting-the-details-just-right-pre-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/getting-the-details-just-right-pre-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Getting the Details Just Right: &#8220;Pre-questions&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Teachers, of course, ask students questions. ALL THE TIME with the questions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">We ask questions DURING a lesson in order to &#8220;check for understanding.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">We encourage students to ask themselves questions AFTER class, because &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/getting-the-details-just-right-retrieval-practice-2\/\" target=\"_blank\">retrieval practice<\/a>&#8221; promotes learning.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And, we ask questions BEFORE a unit &#8212; for at least two very good reasons.<\/p>\n<p>In the <strong>first place<\/strong>, we need to know <em>what our students already know<\/em>. If we don&#8217;t evaluate their prior knowledge, we struggle to build on that prior knowledge in a coherent way.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/AdobeStock_641852178.jpeg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-7249\" src=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/AdobeStock_641852178-300x168.jpeg\" alt=\"Young students reading and concentrating\" width=\"300\" height=\"168\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/AdobeStock_641852178-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/AdobeStock_641852178-1024x574.jpeg 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the\u00a0<strong>second place<\/strong>, we have increasingly strong research about the benefits of &#8220;prequestions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Unlike &#8220;checks for understanding&#8221; and &#8220;retrieval practice,&#8221; &#8220;prequestions&#8221; come <em>before<\/em> the unit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And unlike &#8220;measuring prior knowledge,&#8221; &#8220;prequestions&#8221; deliberately focus on facts and procedures that students\u00a0<em>don&#8217;t yet know<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>So: if I&#8217;m teaching a unit on\u00a0<em>Their Eyes Were Watching God<\/em>, I might ask my students:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8220;What is the definition of a &#8216;bildungsroman&#8217;?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8220;Describe the friendship between Langston Hughes and Countee Cullen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8220;What does hair often symbolize in literature?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Truth to tell, it&#8217;s quite unlikely that my 10th grade students know the answers to these questions. So: those are prequestions &#8212; not checks for understanding, or retrival practice, or confirmations of prior knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the headline: we have reason to believe that &#8220;prequestions&#8221; &#8212; used correctly &#8212; help students learn information.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the story&#8230;<\/p>\n<h2>Hot Off the Presses<\/h2>\n<p>Long-time readers know that Dr. Elizabeth Ligon Bjork has done LOTS of essential work in the field of long-term memory formation and &#8220;desireable difficulties.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And, you know my admiration of Dr. Nick Soderstrom, whose <a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/its-funny-but-its-not-our-instincts-about-learning-are-often-badly-wrong\/\" target=\"_blank\">distinction<\/a> between &#8220;short-term performance&#8221; and &#8220;long-term learning&#8221; should inform all teachers&#8217; discussions.<\/p>\n<p>So: when the two work together, they have my attention!<\/p>\n<p>In this case, they JUST published a <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10648-023-09805-6\" target=\"_blank\">study on the topic of &#8220;prequestions.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>And, this study took place in actual college classrooms &#8212; not simply in a psychology lab. For that reason, its conclusions have a better chance of applying to the real-world work that other teachers do in classrooms.<\/p>\n<p>In this research, students answered prequestions at the beginning of a few lectures. The\u00a0subsequent lectures then provided answers to those questions. (By the way: students got only about 1\/3 of those prequestions right &#8212; so for the most part they didn&#8217;t know the answers.)<\/p>\n<p>On the final exam, students had to answer questions that &#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; DIRECTLY related to those prequestions, or<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; INDIRECTLY related to those prequestions, or<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; were NOT related to the prequestions.<\/p>\n<p>Sure enough, they did better on <em>both directly and indirectly related questions<\/em>, compared to the unrelated questions.<\/p>\n<p>In brief: prequestions really did help college students learn in the classroom.<\/p>\n<p>So simple! So effective!<\/p>\n<h2>So, Those &#8220;Details&#8221;?<\/h2>\n<p>My title promises that we need to &#8220;get the details just right.&#8221; In this case, as in so many others, I have thoughts. (Important note: at this point, I&#8217;m switching from\u00a0<em>reporting on research<\/em> to\u00a0<em>offering my experience-based opinions<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>First Thought<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Soderstrom and Bjork specifically write that prequestions helped because students took them seriously.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s my concern: while college students may have the metacognitive perspective to take prequestions seriously, I do worry that younger students might not.<\/p>\n<p>That is: once younger students realize that their answers to these questions <em>don&#8217;t really matter<\/em>, they might not take them as seriously as their college-age selves would.<\/p>\n<p>The structure of prequestions, in fact, might discourage seriousness. Students rarely know the answers to these questions &#8212; that&#8217;s the point.\u00a0Why would students attend seriously to questions they can&#8217;t possibly answer?<\/p>\n<p>This potential problem leads to two tentative suggestions:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">TELL students how and why prequestions might help, and<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Use prequestions only RARELY.<\/p>\n<p>After all, the more often that students must answer un-answerable questions, the less likely they are to give them appropriate mental effort.<\/p>\n<p>My hope is: students who encounter prequestions only rarely won&#8217;t get cynical about trying to answer them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Second Thought<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If we use prequestions only rarely, are some times better than others?<\/p>\n<p>My instincts are: <strong>yes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Simply put: <em>use prequestions at the beginning of a unit to highlight the most important concepts<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>If we can get the benefit of this technique only rarely, then use it at the most important times.<\/p>\n<p>This advice comes from common sense, not\u00a0 from research &#8212; but common sense isn&#8217;t entirely forbidden on this blog.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Third Thought<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not all prequestions are created equal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">If a prequestion <em>forces a student to think<\/em> &#8212; that&#8217;s a good prequestion: even if they get a wrong answer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">However, if a prequestion\u00a0<em>activates a prior misconception,<\/em> that question will actively interfere with learning.<\/p>\n<p>For that reason, we should follow this rule:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Ask prequestions where students <em>don&#8217;t know<\/em> what the answer is, and where they <em>don&#8217;t\u00a0wrongly believe<\/em> that they do know what the answer is.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For instance:<\/p>\n<p>If I ask my student &#8220;which falls faster: a 10-pound bowling ball or a 15-pound bowling ball,&#8221; they almost certainly &#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; don&#8217;t know the correct answer (that&#8217;s good), but<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; wrongly think that they DO know the correct answer (that&#8217;s bad).<\/p>\n<p>So: that prequestion would activate a prior misconception &#8212; and make learning harder.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, those prequestions I asked at the top of this post (definition of &#8220;bildungsroman&#8221;) almost certainly don&#8217;t active prior misconceptions.<\/p>\n<h2>A Secret Unveiled; A Plea for Teamwork<\/h2>\n<p>I confess I have one deep frustration with this research pool.<\/p>\n<p>Almost all teachers &#8212; and all students &#8212; hate tests.<\/p>\n<p>So: if I name something &#8220;the testing effect,&#8221; teachers and students will HATE it &#8212; even if it&#8217;s beneficial. (Hint: the &#8220;testing effect&#8221; is just another way of talking about &#8220;retrieval practice.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>And, if I name something &#8220;pretesting,&#8221; teachers and students will HATE it &#8212; even if it&#8217;s beneficial. Pretesting sounds like a test, no?<\/p>\n<p>Sure enough, researchers have named a beneficial teaching &#8220;pretesting,&#8221; thereby ensuring confusion, and discouraging its use.<\/p>\n<p>But &#8212; of course &#8212; &#8220;pretesting&#8221; simply means &#8220;asking questions on a topic before you&#8217;ve taught the material.&#8221; It&#8217;s NOT A TEST. It&#8217;s just a set of QUESTIONS.<\/p>\n<p>So, I&#8217;ve been writing about &#8220;prequestions,&#8221; although everyone else in this field calls them &#8220;pretests.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I hope you&#8217;ll join me in this virtuous rebranding.<\/p>\n<h2>TL;DR<\/h2>\n<p>Prequestions (aka &#8220;pretesting&#8221;) help students learn new material &#8212; and not just the information in the questions themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Because the technique works if students take it seriously, I suggest &#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; using it rarely,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; using it for important material, and<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230; asking prequestions that DON&#8217;T activate prior misconceptions.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Soderstrom, N. C., &amp; Bjork, E. L. (2023). Pretesting Enhances Learning in the Classroom.\u00a0<i>Educational Psychology Review<\/i>,\u00a0<i>35<\/i>(3), 88.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Teachers, of course, ask students questions. ALL THE TIME with the questions. We ask questions DURING a lesson in order to &#8220;check for understanding.&#8221; We encourage students to ask themselves questions AFTER class, because &#8220;retrieval practice&#8221; promotes learning. And, we ask questions BEFORE a unit &#8212; for at least two very good reasons. In the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":7249,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lb-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7244"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7244\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7251,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7244\/revisions\/7251"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7249"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}