{"id":4645,"date":"2019-05-25T08:00:20","date_gmt":"2019-05-25T13:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/blog\/?p=4645"},"modified":"2019-05-20T08:41:23","modified_gmt":"2019-05-20T13:41:23","slug":"best-font-name-ever-sans-forgetica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/best-font-name-ever-sans-forgetica\/","title":{"rendered":"Best Font Name Ever: &#8220;Sans Forgetica&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For well over a decade, teachers have heard that we should strive for the right level of &#8220;desirable difficulty.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/AdobeStock_185481946_Credit.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-4646\" src=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/AdobeStock_185481946_Credit-300x192.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"192\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/AdobeStock_185481946_Credit-300x192.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/AdobeStock_185481946_Credit-768x492.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/AdobeStock_185481946_Credit-1024x656.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In brief: <em>easy learning doesn&#8217;t stick<\/em>. If we want to ensure our students learn material in lasting ways, we need to be sure they wrestle with the material just the right amount.<\/p>\n<p>(Of course, getting to &#8220;just the right amount&#8221; requires lots of teacherly thought, experience, and wisdom.)<\/p>\n<p>Many years ago, a Princeton undergraduate had an intriguing idea. Maybe we could increase desirable difficulty by using a <strong>difficult-to-read font<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>His theory went like this. If readers have to concentrate just a little bit more to make sense of what they&#8217;re reading, that extra measure of concentration will be a &#8220;desirable difficulty.&#8221; The result just might be more learning.<\/p>\n<p>He tested his theory in a psych lab. And then &#8212; being a thorough sort &#8212; he tested it for ten weeks in a nearby high school. The result: <a href=\"http:\/\/csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu\/Proceedings\/2010\/papers\/0652\/paper0652.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">students learned more<\/a> when they read material in a hard-to-read (aka, &#8220;disfluent&#8221;) font.<\/p>\n<p>Amazing.<\/p>\n<h2>Today&#8217;s News<\/h2>\n<p>Researchers in Australia wanted to take this idea to the next level.\u00a0They wanted to design an <em>optimally difficult font<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>They tried out several different strategies, including:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">leaving out parts of letters,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">having letters slant the wrong way,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">even having parts of letters misalign with each other.<\/p>\n<p>By testing different combinations of these potentially desirable difficulties, they <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rmit.edu.au\/news\/newsroom\/media-releases-and-expert-comments\/2018\/oct\/sans-forgetica-media-release\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">came up with a winner<\/a> &#8212; which they have deliciously dubbed &#8220;sans forgetica.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In two different experiments, students remembered word pairs better when they studied them in sans forgetica, rather than a typically &#8220;fluent&#8221; font, or in other excessively &#8220;disfluent&#8221; fonts.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re keen to play with typefaces, you can download that font at the link above.<\/p>\n<p>You can check out their video here:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PO2Eo6D5tNQ<\/p>\n<h2>Reasons to be Cautious<\/h2>\n<p>Of course, we should look before we leap.<\/p>\n<p><strong>First<\/strong>: later studies into disfluent fonts have led to decidedly mixed results. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007%2Fs10648-018-9442-x\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">this meta-analysis<\/a>, the results average out to zero.<\/p>\n<p>My own hypothesis, as I&#8217;ve written <a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/think-this-way\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, is that disfluent fonts help <em>only in particular circumstances<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>If the cognitive challenges of a problem are already high, then a disfluent font might make them too hard. If the cognitive challenge is quite low, then a disfluent font might raise them to just the right level.<\/p>\n<p>(As far as I know, no one has tested that hypothesis.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Second<\/strong>: the Australian researchers haven&#8217;t published their findings. So, this research hasn&#8217;t yet been vetted in the way that research usually gets vetted. (The link above &#8212; like all news about sans forgetica &#8212; goes to a university press release.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Third<\/strong>: common sense suggests that disfluent fonts include an important flaw: <em>the more students read a particular font, the more fluent that font will become<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>In other words: sans forgetica might start out optimally disfluent. However, over time, students will <em>get used to the font<\/em>. It will be increasingly fluent the more they use it.<\/p>\n<p>If you want to try disfluent fonts, therefore, I suggest you use them sparingly. You should, I imagine, use them for particularly important information and assignments.<\/p>\n<p>But, to ensure they <em>remain<\/em> disfluent, you should <strong>not<\/strong> have them be a regular part of your students&#8217; reading experience.<\/p>\n<p>To be clear, we have no research guidance at this granular level. As must be true with phrases like &#8220;desirable difficulty,&#8221; teachers must translate the helpful concept to the specifics of our daily classroom lives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Australian researchers have developed a new font, &#8220;sans forgetica,&#8221; which might help students remember what they read. However, we have reason to be careful and cautious before we rely too much on this innovation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":4646,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[66],"class_list":["post-4645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lb-blog","tag-desirable-difficulty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4645"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4645\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4650,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4645\/revisions\/4650"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}