{"id":3526,"date":"2018-06-21T08:00:24","date_gmt":"2018-06-21T13:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/blog\/?p=3526"},"modified":"2018-06-25T20:31:22","modified_gmt":"2018-06-26T01:31:22","slug":"learning-styles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/learning-styles\/","title":{"rendered":"Just Not a Useful Debate: Learning Styles Theory [Updated]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At one of the first Learning and the Brain conferences I attended, a speaker briefly mentioned that <a href=\"https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/6275\/2ca4c446ca7328f8c284f5385f1af1c4212e.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">learning styles theory doesn&#8217;t have much good evidence to support it<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/AdobeStock_49195554_Credit.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3534 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/AdobeStock_49195554_Credit-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"learning styles\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/AdobeStock_49195554_Credit-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/AdobeStock_49195554_Credit-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/AdobeStock_49195554_Credit-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>That comment turned into a heated debate. Several attendees asked vexed, unhappy questions. The speaker held her ground.<\/p>\n<p>When I got in the elevator at the end of that session, I heard one attendee curtly dismiss the speaker&#8217;s objection: &#8220;well, it&#8217;s all just\u00a0<em>statistics<\/em>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>It&#8217;s All Just Statistics<\/h2>\n<p>Well, it IS all statistics.<\/p>\n<p>In the worlds of neuroscience and psychology, researchers rely on statistical methods to ensure their recommendations aren&#8217;t simply hunches.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone can stand behind a microphone and have an opinion. But: if you&#8217;re going to do scientific research, your numbers have to add up.<\/p>\n<p>And, as researchers look at valid statistical models, they just don&#8217;t find good support for the idea that &#8212; for instance &#8212; some people are <em>visual learners<\/em> and others are <em>auditory learners.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The numbers just don&#8217;t add up. Or, in this case: if you teach &#8220;visual learners&#8221; &#8220;visually,&#8221; they don&#8217;t learn any more than if you had taught them &#8220;auditorily&#8221; or &#8220;kinesthetically.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>Multiple Entry Points<\/h2>\n<p>Instead, the content itself often offers guidance on the best way to teach. If you&#8217;re teaching a French or Spanish or Japanese accent, that content is &#8212; by its nature &#8212; auditory.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re teaching geography, that content is visual.<\/p>\n<p>Free throws? Kinesthetic.<\/p>\n<p>Most content, however, can be taught in multiple ways.<\/p>\n<p>For example: I&#8217;m thinking of an actress. She&#8217;s Australian. She played Virginia Woolf in that movie. And, she was married to Tom Cruise.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re shouting NICOLE KIDMAN, you&#8217;re right. Notice that I gave you <strong>three entry points<\/strong> to the neural network that encodes this memory: her country of origin, a role she played, and her marriage.<\/p>\n<p>So: &#8220;teaching to learning styles&#8221; helps because you probably teach your content in different ways &#8212; auditorily, visually, and kinesthetically. Those three different approaches give distinct connections to the memory you want your students to form.<\/p>\n<p>This approach to teaching helps not because of a student&#8217;s learning style, but because all your students now have multiple ways to access that memory.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the theory helps students learn &#8212; but not for the reason it claims to.<\/p>\n<h2>&#8220;Learning Styles&#8221;: Today&#8217;s News<\/h2>\n<p>Daniel Willingham &#8212; one of the early debunkers of learning styles myths &#8212; has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aft.org\/ae\/summer2018\/willingham\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">recently posted his current thoughts on learning styles<\/a>. The short version:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Nope. Learning Styles still don&#8217;t exist. Really.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Learners should &#8220;tune their thinking to the task.&#8221; That is: learn about geography visually &#8212; even if you think you&#8217;re not a &#8220;visual learner.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>More than many researchers, Willingham gets teachers and teaching. So: if you&#8217;re still a learning-styles believer, I encourage you to check out his article.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In related news: Greg Ashman argues that, no, <a href=\"https:\/\/gregashman.wordpress.com\/2018\/06\/18\/criticising-learning-styles-is-not-sexist\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rejecting learning styles theory isn&#8217;t sexist<\/a>. After all, LOTS of thoughtful female researchers reject the theory.<\/p>\n<p>And: the Learning Scientists have a great take on this debate. We shouldn&#8217;t focus simply on rejecting learning styles theory. Instead, we should replace it with a better theory. They have <a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/out-with-the-old\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">thoughts on how to do so<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n[Update, 6\/25\/18]\n<p>Finally, Scientific American has a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/the-problem-with-learning-styles\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">recent article<\/a> showing that most students don&#8217;t use the learning styles that they believe would benefit them. And, when they do, those strategies don&#8217;t help them learn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At one of the first Learning and the Brain conferences I attended, a speaker briefly mentioned that learning styles theory doesn&#8217;t have much good evidence to support it. That comment turned into a heated debate. Several attendees asked vexed, unhappy questions. The speaker held her ground. When I got in the elevator at the end [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":3534,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[15,19],"class_list":["post-3526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lb-blog","tag-classroom-advice","tag-skepticism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3526"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3526\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3561,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3526\/revisions\/3561"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.learningandthebrain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}